Which strategy best supports students in developing scientific arguments based on evidence?

Working collaboratively in small groups is a highly effective strategy for supporting students in developing scientific arguments based on evidence because it promotes dialogue, critical thinking, and peer-to-peer learning. In small groups, students can discuss their ideas, challenge each other's reasoning, and negotiate meaning together. This collaborative environment allows them to share diverse perspectives and synthesize information, which enhances their understanding and ability to articulate their arguments.

Furthermore, group work encourages students to support their claims with evidence from various sources and to clarify their thoughts through discussion. As they explain their reasoning to peers and listen to others' viewpoints, they are more likely to internalize the process of constructing arguments based on evidence. This social aspect of learning reinforces the scientific practices of inquiry and reasoning, making it an essential strategy for fostering deeper comprehension and argumentation skills in the context of science education.